# Top 10 GEO agencies for B2B AI-search visibility

By B2B Buyer Lab editorial team · 2026-09-14

A GEO agency helps a business improve how it appears in AI-generated answers. The work can include better product information, technical fixes, useful research and coverage on other websites. But agencies differ sharply in what they deliver. This ranking is for a B2B team choosing a partner to improve discovery during product research and vendor comparisons.

Omniscient Digital is our first pick for a complete B2B software program. Graphite is a strong alternative for testing changes on an established site, while Minuttia stands out for technical SaaS content. If the main gap is external comparisons, look at Skale; if it is a complex enterprise website, include iPullRank.

## Quick comparison

| Agency | Best fit | Starting price / status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. Omniscient Digital | B2B software content and AI visibility | Full-service engagements from $10,000/month; not a standalone GEO quote. |
| 2. Graphite | Testing AI-search improvements on established sites | No service price established from the reviewed case study. |
| 3. Minuttia | Technical SaaS content that supports product evaluation | No service price stated in the reviewed case study. |
| 4. Siege Media | Comparison content, original research and digital PR | No fee published on the reviewed GEO service page. |
| 5. Skale | Getting a SaaS brand into relevant third-party comparisons | No fee stated in the reviewed Jitter case study. |
| 6. iPullRank | Complex sites and an internal AI-search program | No fee published on the reviewed GEO service page. |
| 7. Go Fish Digital | A focused content and measurement program | No service fee stated in the reviewed case study. |
| 8. NoGood | AI search within a broader growth program | No AEO fee published on the reviewed service page. |
| 9. Avenue Z | PR and brand representation in AI answers | No fee published on the reviewed AI-optimization page. |
| 10. WebFX | A defined entry package with published pricing | From $3,000/month; the plan table specifies a six-month commitment. |

## 1. Omniscient Digital: B2B software content and AI visibility

Omniscient combines GEO with content and SEO for B2B brands. Its service includes competitor and citation analysis, a technical review, a roadmap, content production, brand mentions and ongoing monitoring. [Provider source](https://beomniscient.com/services/generative-engine-optimization/).

**Published work:** In its Convert case study, Omniscient reports tracked prompt visibility moving from 31% to 55% and citation share from 15% to 35% over 60 days. The work included Peec AI tracking, content planning and outreach to relevant third-party sources. These are visibility measurements, not a reported revenue increase. The rounded endpoints do not reproduce the headline growth percentages exactly; we use the endpoints here.

**Pricing:** Full-service engagements from $10,000/month; not a standalone GEO quote.

**Why it ranks here:** Our first pick for a B2B software company buying a complete program. It combines a clearly described service, a named software client example and a published full-service starting price. Graphite is the closer alternative when experimentation across an established website is the main requirement.

A good fit when you need both a plan and a team to produce content and work on external mentions. Your product experts will still need to supply the experience and detail that make the content useful.

The case study is published by the agency. Its raw prompt-level data and a controlled comparison are not available in the reviewed article, so the result does not isolate the effect of each activity.

**Ask before hiring:** How much of the proposed fee covers content, outreach, technical implementation and monitoring?

Sources: [Omniscient Digital — GEO services and pricing](https://beomniscient.com/services/generative-engine-optimization/) · [Omniscient Digital — Convert case study](https://beomniscient.com/case-studies/convert/)

[Read the Omniscient Digital profile](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/reviews/omniscient-digital)

## 2. Graphite: Testing AI-search improvements on established sites

Graphite’s Webflow work shows an experimentation-led approach: revising template pages, answering specific integration questions and testing changes to article structure. The program also included community and video content. [Provider source](https://graphite.io/five-percent/case-studies/webflow-llm-signups).

**Published work:** Graphite reports Webflow’s tracked share of voice increasing from 33% to 64%, and the share of signups attributed to LLMs increasing from 4% to 8%. Here, signup means a free Webflow account. For two page-structure experiments, it describes 10 test URLs paired with 10 control URLs. That methodology applies to those experiments, not every result in the case study.

**Pricing:** No service price established from the reviewed case study.

**Why it ranks here:** Second for the detail in its named case study and the connection to signups. It is particularly relevant to a company with enough existing pages and traffic to compare changes across groups. Omniscient leads this general B2B shortlist for its more explicit full-service buying proposition.

Consider Graphite if your site has substantial product or template inventory and your team can help implement and evaluate experiments. The practical attraction is learning which changes help your own pages.

The signup figures describe free accounts, not paid subscriptions or revenue. Results from an established brand and existing SEO program are not a launch forecast for a new website.

**Ask before hiring:** Which changes will you test, what will the control group be, and who will implement them?

Sources: [Graphite — Webflow AEO case study, January 2026](https://graphite.io/five-percent/case-studies/webflow-llm-signups)

[Read the Graphite profile](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/reviews/graphite)

## 3. Minuttia: Technical SaaS content that supports product evaluation

Minuttia’s Meilisearch engagement combines technical content with search strategy. The published work includes topic hubs, comparison content, code examples and an editorial process for a developer audience. [Provider source](https://minuttia.com/case-studies/meilisearch/).

**Published work:** Minuttia reports 15,261 visitors from AI platforms between January 2025 and July 23, 2026 for Meilisearch. The engagement produced 69 content pieces by late July 2026. The page says the work began with SEO and content, with a dedicated AI-search content pipeline added later. The visitor total therefore belongs to a combined program, not an isolated GEO experiment.

**Pricing:** No service price stated in the reviewed case study.

**Why it ranks here:** Third for its detailed fit with technical software buying journeys and a named client account covering both content and AI referrals. We put it ahead of a narrower outreach service when a company also needs to improve what buyers can read on its own website.

A strong candidate when generic marketing copy will not satisfy your audience. A developer tool needs examples that explain how it works, where it fits and how it differs from alternatives.

The study contains inconsistencies in some aggregate totals and percentage descriptions. We do not use those figures to compare agencies. The published visitor count is an agency-reported total, not independently audited incremental traffic.

**Ask before hiring:** Who will check technical accuracy, and how will you connect content to trials or qualified demos?

Sources: [Minuttia — Meilisearch case study, results through July 2026](https://minuttia.com/case-studies/meilisearch/)

[Read the Minuttia profile](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/reviews/minuttia)

## 4. Siege Media: Comparison content, original research and digital PR

Siege Media offers research reports, digital PR, comparison and pricing content, community work, affiliate partnerships and content refreshes. Its GEO program includes monthly reporting and is aimed at buyers able to commit to a six-month-plus horizon. [Provider source](https://www.siegemedia.com/services/geo).

**Published work:** In the Mentimeter case study, Siege describes software-comparison content for teachers and workplace users. It reports 124,000 ChatGPT sessions over six months. A separate headline mentions 3,400 conversions in one month, but the page does not clearly establish that those were all ChatGPT conversions; we do not treat them as such.

**Pricing:** No fee published on the reviewed GEO service page.

**Why it ranks here:** Fourth because it offers several ways to improve the information buyers encounter: useful pages, original research and distribution. Its named SaaS example gives more context than a service description alone. Minuttia is our earlier call for a highly technical developer audience.

Useful when you need research and content that can serve customers directly and give other publishers a reason to reference you. This is a broader production and distribution brief than a monitoring subscription.

The Mentimeter example is a combined content, technical SEO and design engagement. It does not isolate the contribution of each activity, and the reported sessions are not the same as revenue.

**Ask before hiring:** Which workstreams are necessary for our category, and what will be produced each month?

Sources: [Siege Media — GEO services](https://www.siegemedia.com/services/geo) · [Siege Media — Mentimeter case study](https://www.siegemedia.com/work/mentimeter-content-marketing)

[Read the Siege Media profile](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/reviews/siege-media)

## 5. Skale: Getting a SaaS brand into relevant third-party comparisons

Skale’s Jitter example uses its AI Brand Mentions service to pursue inclusion in third-party software lists and comparisons. The project is explicitly described as a focused engagement rather than a full organic-growth program. [Provider source](https://skale.so/stories/motion-saas/).

**Published work:** Skale reports Jitter’s brand coverage moving from 22% to 55% between October 2025 and January 2026. Its snapshot defines coverage as the percentage of tracked prompts where the brand appeared and separately reports citation share moving from 2% to 4%. These measurements describe the tracked sample, not all searches made by buyers.

**Pricing:** No fee stated in the reviewed Jitter case study.

**Why it ranks here:** Fifth for a specific, inspectable service and named client example. It is a closer fit than the broader firms above when the main gap is relevant coverage elsewhere on the web, rather than a weak website or missing content.

Consider it when your product pages already explain the offer clearly but competitors feature in external comparisons where your brand is absent.

The page gives inconsistent figures in a later recap, so we use the main dated snapshot. It does not establish an increase in sales. Also clarify whether proposed placements are earned, paid or affiliate arrangements.

**Ask before hiring:** Which publications will you approach, and how will commercial relationships be disclosed?

Sources: [Skale — Jitter AI Brand Mentions case study](https://skale.so/stories/motion-saas/)

[Read the Skale profile](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/reviews/skale)

## 6. iPullRank: Complex sites and an internal AI-search program

iPullRank’s GEO service combines technical content work, analysis of related questions, visibility measurement and planning across owned and external media. It also offers help building an internal program. [Provider source](https://ipullrank.com/services/geo).

**Published work:** The service page lays out assessment, prioritization and activation, with different needs for emerging, growth and enterprise teams. It names citation frequency, AI referral traffic and coverage of related questions among its measurements. These are descriptions of its method, not evidence of a particular customer outcome.

**Pricing:** No fee published on the reviewed GEO service page.

**Why it ranks here:** Sixth in this B2B buying shortlist because its technical approach is clearly described, while the reviewed service page does not offer a directly comparable named GEO result or price. For a complex enterprise website, we would move it to the first round of conversations.

Useful when the problem involves site structure, a large content library, multiple business units or coordinating work across internal teams.

Technical terminology should translate into changes your team can implement and evaluate. A proprietary metric is useful only if you can understand its calculation and the decision it supports.

**Ask before hiring:** What will we change on the site, and which measurements will show whether those changes helped?

Sources: [iPullRank — GEO services](https://ipullrank.com/services/geo)

[Read the iPullRank profile](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/reviews/ipullrank)

## 7. Go Fish Digital: A focused content and measurement program

Go Fish Digital publishes a detailed account of applying GEO to its own agency website. Its work covered buyer questions, baseline measurement, substantial topic pages and follow-up questions in the same buying journey. [Provider source](https://gofishdigital.com/blog/generative-engine-optimization-geo-case-study-driving-leads/).

**Published work:** The September 2025 study reports 43% growth in monthly AI-referral traffic and an 83.33% increase in monthly conversions over its stated three-month program. It describes producing five to eight core pages. Despite the headline “3X’ing Leads,” the body’s conversion figure is 83.33%; we use the body and identify the project as self-promotion.

**Pricing:** No service fee stated in the reviewed case study.

**Why it ranks here:** Seventh for a practical description of execution and measurement. We place it below named-client examples because this particular study is about the agency itself, which is a different test from delivering the service for another business.

Consider it if you need help turning a small set of commercial topics into detailed content and setting up reporting alongside that work.

The study acknowledges the agency already had an established reputation. Its result does not establish what a newer B2B brand would achieve from the same number of pages.

**Ask before hiring:** Can you show a client example with starting conditions similar to ours?

Sources: [Go Fish Digital — GEO case study, 24 September 2025](https://gofishdigital.com/blog/generative-engine-optimization-geo-case-study-driving-leads/)

[Read the Go Fish Digital profile](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/reviews/go-fish-digital)

## 8. NoGood: AI search within a broader growth program

NoGood offers AEO across visibility research, content, earned media and technical implementation. It uses Goodie AI for monitoring and reporting and describes linking AI referrals to conversions. [Provider source](https://nogood.io/answer-engine-optimization-aeo/).

**Published work:** The service page attributes 23-fold AI-search traffic growth and 27-fold AI-platform conversion growth year over year to its SteelSeries program. Those are provider-reported headline figures. The page does not supply enough underlying data to compare their scale with the other studies here.

**Pricing:** No AEO fee published on the reviewed service page.

**Why it ranks here:** Eighth for the breadth of its offering and an AI-specific result on its service page. Its highlighted example is a consumer gaming brand, so we give the B2B software examples above more weight for this particular brief.

Relevant if your team wants to coordinate AI-search work with content, social and other acquisition channels. Establish who owns each channel so the same deliverable is not counted twice.

A result for gaming accessories does not establish the same performance for a long B2B buying cycle. Separate the agency fee from software access and clarify what data you can export.

**Ask before hiring:** Which B2B outcomes will the program measure, and what reporting access remains when the engagement ends?

Sources: [NoGood — AEO services](https://nogood.io/answer-engine-optimization-aeo/)

[Read the NoGood profile](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/reviews/nogood)

## 9. Avenue Z: PR and brand representation in AI answers

Avenue Z combines AI-search content and technical work with media outreach. Its page highlights fintech, finance and technology among its specialties and includes monitoring for missing or inaccurate brand mentions. [Provider source](https://avenuez.com/services/ai-optimization/).

**Published work:** The reviewed service page describes content mapping, crawlability improvements and outreach to relevant publications. Its work examples include keyword and lead-conversion gains from wider digital projects; we do not relabel those as AI-citation results.

**Pricing:** No fee published on the reviewed AI-optimization page.

**Why it ranks here:** Ninth because the service is relevant when public reputation and external coverage are central to the problem. It ranks below the named GEO case studies because the work examples on the reviewed page report broader website and SEO results.

A useful candidate when the brand is being misunderstood or important product claims need clearer support across its website and public coverage.

Media coverage does not itself prove that an AI service cited the story or recommended the business. Reporting should show both the coverage earned and the observed AI answers.

**Ask before hiring:** How will the PR work address the specific sources and inaccurate descriptions found in our audit?

Sources: [Avenue Z — AI search optimization services](https://avenuez.com/services/ai-optimization/)

[Read the Avenue Z profile](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/reviews/avenue-z)

## 10. WebFX: A defined entry package with published pricing

WebFX sells GEO alongside SEO and uses its OmniSEO platform for visibility tracking. Its public plan table specifies prompt coverage, monthly assets and a six-month commitment. [Provider source](https://www.webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/).

**Published work:** The Bronze table lists 50 target prompts and three flexible assets per month. Those figures describe capacity, not promised citations or leads. Clarify what counts as an asset and whether technical implementation uses the same allowance.

**Pricing:** From $3,000/month; the plan table specifies a six-month commitment.

**Why it ranks here:** Tenth in this shortlist because it gives buyers a concrete way to scope and budget an entry program. The more detailed B2B case studies above carry more weight in our ordering, but WebFX is a sensible first comparison when a published package matters most.

Consider it if you want a packaged program and a clear starting point for comparing monthly scope.

The entry fee is not the full price for every business. The same table lists larger packages, and additional requirements need to be confirmed in a proposal.

**Ask before hiring:** What will the three monthly assets be for our website, and which implementation work is included?

Sources: [WebFX — AI search services and plan table](https://www.webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/)

[Read the WebFX profile](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/reviews/webfx)

## Which GEO agency fits your situation?

For a software company starting a coordinated content and AI-search program, compare Omniscient Digital, Minuttia and Siege Media. The choice depends on your audience: developer education, broad buyer comparisons and original research need different editorial skills.

For an established site with many product or template pages, Graphite is worth examining for its experiment design. For a large site with internal implementation teams, iPullRank offers a more technical starting point. Neither brief is solved simply by ordering more articles.

If buyers understand your product but it is missing from relevant third-party lists, compare Skale’s focused service with the outreach work inside a broader program. If you need public relations and more accurate brand descriptions together, consider Avenue Z.

WebFX provides a published entry package for budget comparison. NoGood suits buyers evaluating AI search alongside a wider growth program. Go Fish Digital provides a practical content-and-measurement example, with the important distinction that the reviewed experiment was on its own site.

## What do these GEO agencies cost?

Among the reviewed offers, WebFX publishes an entry price of $3,000 per month, with a six-month commitment in its plan table. Omniscient publishes a $10,000 monthly starting price for full-service engagements. These cover different scopes; the gap does not show that one charges more for identical work.

For the other eight, we did not establish a current service price from the pages cited in their entries. That is a gap in the public information, not a claim that they are expensive. Directory estimates and an agency’s market-pricing article are not substitutes for its own proposal.

Compare the total commitment as well as the monthly fee. Include software, content production, implementation, outreach costs and any handover charge. A monitoring-only offer should not be compared with a team that also writes, publishes and fixes the website.

Sources: [WebFX plan table](https://www.webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/) · [Omniscient full-service starting price](https://beomniscient.com/services/generative-engine-optimization/)

## How to read the case studies in this list

A citation is a source link in an AI answer. A brand mention can appear without a link. A referral is a visit to your website. A conversion is an action you have defined, such as a trial signup or demo request. Revenue comes later. None of these measures should silently stand in for another.

The studies use different clients, periods, prompts and tools. A 55% visibility figure from one study cannot be compared with a 64% figure from another as if the agencies took the same test. A large percentage increase can also start from a very small number.

We give more weight to named projects that explain the work, define the measurement and show the starting point. Provider-published results are useful evidence, but they are not independent audits. Where a headline conflicts with the body, the entry explains which figures we used.

An agency’s own appearance in an AI-generated list is evidence about that particular query. It does not establish whether the agency can sell your product, work in your industry or deliver reliably.

## How we ranked these ten agencies

This is an editorial ranking for a B2B company buying an AI-search visibility program, with particular weight on software buying journeys. We selected ten firms from the directory’s GEO coverage for a closer review of their current service pages and project examples. It is not an exhaustive ranking of every agency.

The order gives priority to a clear B2B fit and inspectable AI-search work, followed by the usefulness of the delivery description and commercial terms. Named client examples generally carry more weight than an agency’s own experiment; service descriptions carry less weight than an explained result. We do not assign invented numerical scores.

This approach puts complete software programs near the top and narrower services further down. That does not make a focused service worse for the buyer who needs exactly that work. The individual entries explain when to change the shortlist order.

The linked pages were reviewed on 14 September 2026. We did not commission these agencies, access their private analytics or conduct client-reference calls for this article. Prices and scopes need confirmation before purchase.

## Can a GEO agency guarantee that AI will recommend you?

No agency controls an AI platform’s organic answers. Buy a defined service, with observable changes and reporting, rather than a promised permanent position. Google explicitly says that meeting its requirements does not guarantee indexing or inclusion.

GEO and AEO are overlapping agency labels. For a buying decision, the useful question is which platforms, content and outcomes the contract covers. A different acronym is not a different deliverable.

You may not need a separate agency if your existing search and content team can do the work and measure it. Add outside help for an identifiable gap: technical capacity, production, research, outreach or measurement.

Sources: [Google Search Central — AI features and your website](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-features)

## Research notes

We reviewed the linked pages on 2026-09-14. Recommendations are editorial assessments of published scope, not independently measured delivery outcomes. This article does not include hands-on demos or client-reference interviews. Prices and availability can change; confirm them with the provider.

[Methodology](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/methodology) · [Corrections](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/corrections) · [Editorial policy](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/conflicts)

## Sources and references

Reviewed 2026-09-14. Case studies are published by the named agencies; their results have not been independently audited by the lab.

- [Omniscient full-service starting price](https://beomniscient.com/services/generative-engine-optimization/)
- [Omniscient Digital — Convert case study](https://beomniscient.com/case-studies/convert/)
- [Graphite — Webflow AEO case study, January 2026](https://graphite.io/five-percent/case-studies/webflow-llm-signups)
- [Minuttia — Meilisearch case study, results through July 2026](https://minuttia.com/case-studies/meilisearch/)
- [Siege Media — GEO services](https://www.siegemedia.com/services/geo)
- [Siege Media — Mentimeter case study](https://www.siegemedia.com/work/mentimeter-content-marketing)
- [Skale — Jitter AI Brand Mentions case study](https://skale.so/stories/motion-saas/)
- [iPullRank — GEO services](https://ipullrank.com/services/geo)
- [Go Fish Digital — GEO case study, 24 September 2025](https://gofishdigital.com/blog/generative-engine-optimization-geo-case-study-driving-leads/)
- [NoGood — AEO services](https://nogood.io/answer-engine-optimization-aeo/)
- [Avenue Z — AI search optimization services](https://avenuez.com/services/ai-optimization/)
- [WebFX plan table](https://www.webfx.com/seo/services/ai-search-optimization/)
- [Google Search Central — AI features and your website](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-features)

## Continue your shortlist

- [GEO agency pricing: what you pay for and how to measure results](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/blog/geo-agency-pricing-deliverables)

[Browse GEO agencies](https://b2bbuyerlab.com/agencies/geo)